<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Happens to Writing in the Era of High Stakes Testing?</title>
	<link>http://www.teachopedia.com/blog/what-happens-to-writing-in-the-era-of-high-stakes-testing/</link>
	<description>From your friends at Teach Kentucky</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 11:44:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah Yost</title>
		<link>http://www.teachopedia.com/blog/what-happens-to-writing-in-the-era-of-high-stakes-testing/#comment-118</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah Yost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 20:03:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.teachopedia.com/blog/what-happens-to-writing-in-the-era-of-high-stakes-testing/#comment-118</guid>
		<description>Thanks!  

I guess the point I was trying to make was that standards are helpful as a starting point, but not necessarily as the final goal, or the point at which we separate the sheep from the goats.  

I think we ought to teach to the standards, and (sure!) even test them, but the current high stakes testing climate, in which your entire soul as a teacher is cast into the firey pits over some ambiguous multiple choice and open response questions, or some hazily defined writing matrix, is problematic.

Keep the standards, but de-emphasize testing.  Have more inspirational professional development that excites teachers, who can then excite and inspire their students.  Write curricula around questions connected to the standards.  Offer websites and enriching resources within curriculum documents; the more accessible inspirational resources are for the standards, the more likely teachers are to use them.

And of course don't give up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks!  </p>
<p>I guess the point I was trying to make was that standards are helpful as a starting point, but not necessarily as the final goal, or the point at which we separate the sheep from the goats.  </p>
<p>I think we ought to teach to the standards, and (sure!) even test them, but the current high stakes testing climate, in which your entire soul as a teacher is cast into the firey pits over some ambiguous multiple choice and open response questions, or some hazily defined writing matrix, is problematic.</p>
<p>Keep the standards, but de-emphasize testing.  Have more inspirational professional development that excites teachers, who can then excite and inspire their students.  Write curricula around questions connected to the standards.  Offer websites and enriching resources within curriculum documents; the more accessible inspirational resources are for the standards, the more likely teachers are to use them.</p>
<p>And of course don&#8217;t give up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Lane</title>
		<link>http://www.teachopedia.com/blog/what-happens-to-writing-in-the-era-of-high-stakes-testing/#comment-117</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Lane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 17:39:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.teachopedia.com/blog/what-happens-to-writing-in-the-era-of-high-stakes-testing/#comment-117</guid>
		<description>Terrific piece.
My political side is saying, "I can't agree with you more."
My aesthetic side is saying, "How well put!"
My pragmatic side (do I get another side?) is saying, "OK, so what do we do now?"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Terrific piece.<br />
My political side is saying, &#8220;I can&#8217;t agree with you more.&#8221;<br />
My aesthetic side is saying, &#8220;How well put!&#8221;<br />
My pragmatic side (do I get another side?) is saying, &#8220;OK, so what do we do now?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
